In recent times, the Keystone XL project has been the subject of deep controversy. A proposal spanning three US presidential terms, this project was expected to expand Canada’s energy reach into the U.S. while strengthening cross-border trade and national prosperity.
Though the project was officially cancelled in 2021, economic pressures and shifting trade dynamics have reignited discussion between the Canadian and US governments about its potential revival. The question now is: can the Keystone XL rise again?
When the Keystone XL project failed the first time, it was not for a lack of effort or potential.
The project promised thousands of construction jobs, the project would have also contributed over $2.4 billion to Canada’s GDP, and an estimated $30 billion in tax and royalty revenues.
The pipeline would’ve been added to the existing Keystone network in Alberta and extended southward into Nebraska, where new and existing pipeline infrastructure could transport Canadian crude to the US gulf coast. In essence, Keystone XL would’ve created a direct line between Alberta’s oil patch and the major concentration of US oil refineries.
From the changing administrations to the complex permit requirements, the Keystone project had its work cut out. Each regulatory delay compounded investors’ worry and uncertainty, making long-term financing difficult.
While environmental activism received much of the attention, the decisive blow came from government hesitation and the inability to provide a consistent policy framework that could give private partners the confidence needed to proceed.
US President Joe Biden pulled the plug on Keystone XL in June 2021 after over a decade of delays and regulatory roadblocks.
The talk of the revival of the Keystone XL project no longer seems like rumors, as there have been talks between Prime Minister Mark Carney and President Trump about the development of energy projects that would help the two countries. But the question remains, why revisit the Keystone XL project?
The global economic situation has shifted drastically. Canada finds itself in a bind, with the rising cost of living, the increasing competition from countries in the energy space, and tariffs, among other issues.
Energy independence has never been more valuable than it is now. This moment in time emphasizes the need for more nation-building projects.
A new version of the Keystone XL pipeline would help reassert Canada’s position as a strong, competitive economy by reducing reliance on oil imports from countries like Saudi Arabia and Nigeria. Short of refining our own oil for domestic use, having it refined in the US is the next best option – think higher revenues for Canadian producers and more certainty for industry.
Having the ability to fetch competitive prices for our commodities means high-paying jobs, increased government revenues, and long-term prosperity. For young people like me, it’s a no brainer – new major resource projects are going to make Canada a better place to live, study, and work.
Reviving a project like the Keystone XL pipeline would not come about without difficulties.
One of the major challenges lies in regulation. Both Canada and the US have some of the world’s most robust and comprehensive regulatory regimes. Regulation ensures resource projects are developed as responsibly as possible, which is assuredly a good thing.
That said, as public and political appetite for resource projects continues to grow, it’s clear that the regulatory approval process (in Canada, especially) must be streamlined to avoid the same problems that doomed the original project and many others along the way.
Another challenge remains financial. A project of this scale and magnitude will require billions in investments. Market uncertainty, interest rates, and competition from other sectors means large-scale financing may be challenging to secure.
Lastly, cross-border coordination remains a critical issue. We are – after all – in the middle of a trade war with our southern neighbors. Any proposal being made must account for potential shifts and changes in both countries’ governments and policies.
Though the roadblocks might appear large, I believe they’re manageable. The conversation surrounding the Keystone XL project is more than just talking about a pipeline; it’s about Canada’s direction and the building blocks that will define the future generation.
To remain strong amidst the global uncertainty, we must be willing to match our ambition with nation-building initiatives and projects. Reviving the Keystone XL project would serve as a beacon, not just one of hope but one of confidence in our capacity to execute more strategic and complex projects down the line.
Sign up for updates about our work at YCR. Please sign up using a personal email and not a work or school email if possible.
"*" indicates required fields
A couple weeks ago, YCR wrapped up its annual case competition. This year’s theme was expediting pipeline approvals, which couldn’t be more timely considering Enbridge’s recent statement regarding the regulatory
When most people think of Canada’s energy sector, they imagine oil rigs on the prairies or wind turbines spinning along the coast. But behind the scenes, there’s another critical force
Pipelines are the backbone of Canada’s energy sector. Every day, millions of barrels of oil and gas move across the country…