![]()
![]()
Welcome to the Build It or Block It Challenge
As future engineers, the decisions you make about what Canada builds—or doesn’t build—will follow you through your career. Every bridge, reactor, or pipeline represents thousands of choices: design, cost, community, and consequence. Each infrastructure project involves technical trade-offs, community impact, national interest, and global positioning.
In this challenge, your group will evaluate five major Canadian projects (currently under discussion or development) that could reshape Canada’s economy, security, and energy future. Each one could be described as nation-building—large in scale, significant in impact, and deeply tied to how Canada grows, trades, and competes globally.
Your task (10 minutes total):
- Read the five project briefs below.
- Discuss the benefits and challenges of each, examining key dimensions:
- National security / geopolitical advantage
- Jobs & economic impact
- GDP / fiscal benefits
- Environmental & climate outcomes
- Investment / technical feasibility
- Social licence / partnerships (including Indigenous relations)
- As a group choose:
- The one project you would build first if Canada could only proceed with one right now
- The one project you would build first if Canada could only proceed with one right now
- Be ready to report back with a two-minute pitch stating:
- Which project your group chose to build (and why)
- What values drove your decision (economic growth, environment, equity, national security or global influence)
There is no “right answer”—the point is to think critically about trade-offs, engineering implications, and national strategy.
Project Briefs
1. Northwest BC Oil Pipeline (pipeline from Alberta to Pacific coast)
Overview:
Canada is considering a major oil-pipeline corridor that would transport Alberta’s crude oil to a West-Coast export terminal, allowing access to Asian energy markets and reducing reliance on U.S. export routes. This project would not only shift Canada’s trade patterns but also strengthen our energy sovereignty, reduce transit vulnerability, and enhance geopolitical positioning. Engineers would be challenged with pipeline design, environmental mitigation, routing, and export terminal logistics.
- Jobs & Economic Impact: Construction would create over 35,000 direct and indirect jobs at peak, plus long-term operations and maintenance employment.
- GDP / Fiscal Benefit: Could contribute $50–70 billion in GDP and billions in federal and provincial revenues over its lifetime through royalties, taxes, and exports.
- Environmental / Climate Outcome: Would raise Canadian emissions modestly (roughly 1–2 Mt CO₂e/year) but potentially replace higher-emission imports globally, improving net global efficiency.
- Investment / Technical Feasibility: Technically straightforward for Canadian pipeline firms but carries major permitting, cost, and financing challenges.
- Social Licence / Partnerships: Strong support in Alberta and Saskatchewan, mixed in British Columbia; success depends on early Indigenous co-ownership and transparent engagement.
- National Security / Geopolitical Advantage: Reduces reliance on U.S. export routes, diversifies energy markets toward Asia, and strengthens Canada’s global leverage.
2. Darlington New Nuclear Project (Small Modular Reactors – Ontario)
Overview:
At the site of the existing Darlington Nuclear Generating Station in Ontario a new cluster of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) is planned. This project leverages existing licensing, infrastructure and manufacturing supply chains to position Canada at the cutting-edge of nuclear innovation. Engineers will work on nuclear design, manufacturing, licensing, operation and export readiness. This aligns clean-energy goals, industrial policy and national technological leadership.
- Jobs & Economic Impact: Expected to generate 18,000 jobs during construction and about 3,700 ongoing jobs for operation and supply-chain support.
- GDP / Fiscal Benefit: Projected to contribute $35 billion+ to Ontario’s GDP over its life through technology development and power generation.
- Environmental / Climate Outcome: Provides zero-emission baseload power, supporting electrification and deep decarbonization without intermittency.
- Investment / Technical Feasibility: Among the world’s first grid-scale SMR deployments; engineering complexity high but risk mitigated by existing licensed site.
- Social License / Partnerships: Generally favorable public opinion in Ontario for nuclear expansion, supported by local municipalities and industry.
- National Security / Geopolitical Advantage: Positions Canada as a global nuclear technology leader, reduces import dependence, and bolsters energy resilience.
3. Churchill Falls Renewal Project (Hydro expansion in Newfoundland & Labrador with Quebec)
Overview:
This project involves upgrading and expanding the existing Churchill Falls Generating Station hydro-facility in Labrador, with new agreements with Quebec replacing antiquated contracts, modernizing infrastructure, and creating a cleaner power base for decades. For Canadian engineers, it means civil/heavy-construction work in remote terrain, new transmission links, and inter-provincial energy trade. Its significance lies in clean power, regional economic development and national energy reliability.
- Jobs & Economic Impact: Could create 4,000–6,000 skilled jobs during construction and sustain hundreds more for operations and maintenance.
- GDP / Fiscal Benefit: Expected to bring tens of billions in long-term provincial revenue through modernized contracts and fairer power pricing.
- Environmental / Climate Outcome: Delivers zero-emission electricity, supporting Canada’s 2050 climate goals and replacing fossil generation elsewhere.
- Investment / Technical Feasibility: A multi-billion-dollar, multi-year hydro expansion requiring major civil engineering and transmission upgrades in remote terrain.
- Social License / Partnerships: Viewed positively in Atlantic Canada; cooperation with Innu Nation and local communities remains essential to success.
- National Security / Geopolitical Advantage: Improves inter-provincial energy security and grid stability while strengthening Canada’s low-carbon export potential.
4. Red Chris Mine Expansion (Northwest Critical Minerals Corridor, Northwestern BC)
Overview:
The Red Chris Mine expansion in northwestern British Columbia proposes a major development to extend the mine’s lifespan by over a decade and significantly increase Canada’s annual copper production. Led by Newmont Mining and Imperial Metals, the project supports Canada’s role as a reliable supplier of critical minerals essential for global manufacturing and energy technologies. Engineers would address underground mine expansion, processing optimization, infrastructure integration and environmental mitigation systems. The project is part of the proposed Northwest Critical Conservation Corridor, which includes opportunities for critical minerals development, clean power transmission, Indigenous project leadership and the potential creation of a large-scale conservation area.
- Jobs & Economic Impact: Construction is expected to employ approximately 1,800 workers at peak, with about 1,500 long-term operational roles supporting regional economic development.
- GDP / Fiscal Benefit: Increased copper production could strengthen Canada’s mining sector contribution to GDP, support export revenues and enhance domestic supply-chain capacity.
- Environmental / Climate Outcome: Operational upgrades are expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by over 70%, while mining impacts on land use and ecosystems remain key considerations.
- Investment / Technical Feasibility: Expansion builds on an existing operational mine with established infrastructure, though underground development, capital investment requirements and commodity price dynamics influence project feasibility.
- Social License / Partnerships: The project involves close collaboration with the Tahltan Nation, reflecting evolving Indigenous partnership models and regional development priorities.
- National Security / Geopolitical Advantage: Strengthens Canada’s position as a secure supplier of copper and other critical minerals essential to global energy transition technologies and advanced manufacturing.
5. Arctic Economic and Security Corridor (Slave Geological Province, Northwest Territories)
Overview:
The Arctic Economic and Security Corridor (AESC) is a proposed approximately 400-kilometre all season-road through the Slave Geological Province in the Northwest Territories, connecting to the Grays Bay Road and deep-water port on the Arctic Ocean Led by the Tłı̨chǫ Government and Yellowknives Dene First Nation in partnership with the Government of the Northwest Territories, the project aims to unlock mineral development opportunities, strengthen northern economic growth and enhance Canada’s security presence in the Arctic. Engineers would address remote terrain road design, climate-resilient infrastructure systems, logistics integration with port and airfield facilities, and environmental protection in sensitive northern ecosystems.
- Jobs & Economic Impact: Construction and long-term operations could create significant employment opportunities in northern communities, supporting regional development and enabling future mining and logistics industries.
- GDP / Fiscal Benefit: By enabling access to mineral-rich regions and facilitating export infrastructure, the corridor could contribute substantially to Canada’s long-term economic growth and resource revenues.
- Environmental / Climate Outcome: While improved access may accelerate resource development and associated impacts, project planning includes Indigenous-led studies and co-management impact assessments aimed at minimizing effects on wildlife and ecosystems.
- Investment / Technical Feasibility: Building all-season transportation infrastructure remote Arctic conditions presents engineering and cost challenges, including permafrost stability, climate resilience and logistical complexity.
- Social License / Partnerships: The project is being led by Indigenous governments with ongoing community consultations, reflecting evolving models of Indigenous infrastructure leadership and regional decision-making.
- National Security / Geopolitical Advantage: Establishing an all-season corridor to a deep-water Arctic port supports northern sovereignty, enables expanded military and civilian presence, and strengthens Canada’s strategic position in the Arctic.
Discussion Questions
Use these to guide your group conversation:
- Which project delivers the greatest long-term benefit for Canadians, and why?
- What trade-offs (environmental, financial, or political) are you willing to accept to make it happen?
- Which project best aligns with your values as an engineer: innovation, sustainability, equity or national security?
- If you were the project lead accountable for success or failure, how would your choice change?
- What lessons about leadership, teamwork, engineering judgement, and stakeholder communication apply across all six projects?